Google Find us on Google+

STUDENTS AND COACHES BEING FORCED TO VIEW ALL IN STATE OF UNDRESS

Nov 18, 2018 by

Photo by Skyler King on Unsplash

“Students and Coaches Being Forced To View All in State of Undress”

By Donna Garner

11.18.18

[COMMENTS FROM DONNA GARNER – As uncomfortable as the following article is to read, we must all face reality. For all of those people who have been patting themselves on the back for being so kind, inclusive, and tolerant of the idea of “gender identity,” look at the mess that has been created for those students and educators who actually have to deal with this in real life.

A male P. E. teacher is in potential danger of being fired for refusing to be in the presence of an undressed objectively female student in a boys’ dressing room; the male students were given no notice before the “girl” walked in and saw them in their underwear; no previous notification had been given to their parents; and the P. E. teacher was under a gag order from the administration not to answer any of the boys’ questions.  

Now look at the kind of LGBTQ idiocy and chaos that is coming for every school in America if not stopped:

QUOTES FROM THIS ARTICLE: 

According to the “trans” ideology, all it takes to “identify” as the opposite sex is a declaration. No gender dysphoria diagnosis or experience of gender dysphoria, no surgery, no cross-sex hormone-doping, not even cross-dressing is necessary to identify as the opposite sex.

Further, society is obligated to treat “trans”-identifying persons in all ways and in all contexts as the sex they declare they are. Therefore, a girl with intact breasts who identifies as a boy should be free to undress and shower naked with the boys, and a boy with an intact penis and testicles who identifies as a girl should be free to undress and shower with girls.

A girl with intact breasts who identifies as a boy should be allowed to swim on the boys’ swim team wearing a boys’ Speedo. Male coaches who enter boys’ locker rooms should treat girls who pretend they’re boys and are changing no differently than boys who are changing.

As Laurie Higgins stated in her article, “So, now what would have once been too scandalous to even imagine is being or going to be required.”

Thankfully, the American College of Pediatricians has provided us with firm grounds on which to stand. Every public policy from the federal level to the school level should be built upon sound medical science. That is offered in this one report:  Updated Sept. 2017 – “Gender Ideology Harms Children” – American College of Pediatricians — https://www.acpeds.org/the-college-speaks/position-statements/gender-ideology-harms-children

QUESTION:

Now what are we going to do about it? Are we going to stand by while our entire culture and the future of our children are corrupted and co-opted by a false, self-destructive narrative sold to us by the LGBTQ movement; or are we going to do whatever we can to exert pressure on our public officials to move to a sensible, safe, common sense, and medically sound position? 

We are already far down this LGBTQ slippery slope; but perhaps now as we read Laurie Higgins’ article, we will see what tolerance of perversion means in real time. We must realize that this is coming TO OUR SCHOOLS LOCALLY if we do not do something about it now!

I have already sent my great concerns and doable recommendations to my state legislators who could easily stop this debacle with laws based upon the medical science. Have you done the same?  

11.12.18 — “Open Letter to Texas Legislature – Must Stand on Sound Medical Science Re: Transgenderism”

From Donna Garner – EdViews.org — http://www.educationviews.org/open-letter-to-texas-legislature-must-stand-on-sound-medical-science-re-transgenderism%EF%BB%BF/

Please be courageous and caring enough to read the following article by Laurie Higgins.]

======================

“Male Teacher Disciplined for Refusal to Supervise Girl in Boys’ Locker Room”


By Laurie Higgins

11.17.18 – Published by Illinois Family Institute, Republished by EdViews.org

Excerpts from this article:

Chasco Middle School in Port Richey, Florida did what many presumptuous and foolish k-12 schools around the country are doing: The administration unilaterally decided to sexually integrate the boys’ locker room with no notification to either the boys or their parents.

The boys, and shortly thereafter their parents, learned about it when an objectively female student who seeks to pass as a boy humiliated them when she entered the boys’ locker room while they were in their underwear.

The boys immediately left the locker room and sought help from two P.E. teachersRobert Oppedisano and Stephanie Christensen—who according to Liberty Counsel, “were powerless to respond, because administrators had placed a gag order on them, and told them that they could not answer the boys on these questions.”

To be clear, not even student and parental notification would make this unjust and foolish decision right. Providing no notification just made a lousy decision worse.

Liberty Counsel further outlined the outrageous nature of the Chasco administration’s decision:

Robert also objected to administrators’ order that he continue to walk into and supervise the locker room, despite a girl potentially being nude or undressed in that area. The administrators told him that the girl in question had “every right to use the locker room,” including the right to disrobe in the open locker area, and shower in its open showers, where Robert is required to periodically walk in and supervise.

Robert will not knowingly place himself in a position to observe a minor female in the nude or otherwise in a state of undress. Now, Robert has been told by administrators that he will be transferred to another school as discipline for “not doing your job in the locker room.”

Now, as a result of the incoherent “trans” ideology, a male P.E. teacher could be fired for intentionally being in the presence of an undressed objectively female student if she’s satisfied with her biological sex and a male teacher could be fired for refusing to be in the presence of an undressed objectively female student, so long as she is dissatisfied with her biological sex.

What if a male teacher is in the presence of a genderfluid objectively female student who, while changing clothes on a day when she’s “identifying” as a boy, suddenly “identifies” as a girl? Yikes.

Some questions for the Chasco Middle School administration:

  • Do students have any right not to be seen partially or fully unclothed by students, staff, faculty, or administrators of the opposite sex?
  • Should “trans”-identifying coaches be treated as if they were the sex they pretend to be? For example, should the objectively male swim coach who pretends to be a woman be allowed full access to the girls’ locker room? If not, why not?
  • Do staff and faculty who believe it is profoundly wrong to see pubescent students of the opposite sex partially or fully unclothed have any rights?
  • Why do we have any sex-segregated locker rooms and restrooms in public schools if objective biological sex has no intrinsic connection to feelings of modesty and the desire for and right to privacy when engaged in intimate bodily functions or changing clothes?

Ironically, while violating the physical privacy of children, the Chasco administration is trying to cloak its secret plan to sexually integrate private spaces by appealing to—you guessed it—privacy.

But neither privacy policies nor laws prohibit the administration from notifying students and parents that the school has adopted—with no board vote—a new practice of sexually integrating locker rooms and restrooms and that boys and girls can expect that they will be sharing private spaces with persons of the opposite sex.

(As an aside, I wonder how female faculty or administrators would feel if they were in their underwear in a women’s faculty locker room when without notification an objectively male colleague walked in.)

The brains behind this “trans”-cultic operation to violate the privacy of and humiliate students is Jackie Jackson-Dean who consulted with every pro-“LGBTQ”-advocacy organization she could find—including the Southern Poverty Law Center’s (SPLC) government school indoctrination arm, ironically called “Teaching Tolerance.”

The weedy thicket of Dean’s recommendations include encouraging the school to participate in every pro-homosexual/pro-“trans” event sponsored by the Gay, Lesbian and Straight Education Network (GLSEN), encouraging teachers to use incorrect pronouns when referring to students who masquerade as the opposite sex, and publicly praising teachers who affirm pro-“LGBT” orthodoxy (thereby implicitly shaming those who don’t).

Jackson-Dean’s Twitter account reveals she’s a hardcore, far-left pro-homosexual/pro-“trans” activist who loves the SPLC and opposes Brett Kavanaugh.

There’s an odd omission in her rainbow-adorned document. She neglected to mention the following statement which comes right out of the same Title IX document [ a document ] to which she links:

On the federal side, the Title IX regulations issued by the U.S. Department of Education allow schools to provide separate but comparable bathrooms, locker rooms, and shower facilities on the basis of sex….

While there is no definitive national legal authority on the issue, federal courts in non-school cases have recognized a fundamental right to privacy or acknowledged the legitimacy of safety concerns in cases involving individuals undressing, using the restroom, or showering in an area to which a member of the opposite birth sex has access.

Moreover, a federal district court recently asked the question whether a university engages in unlawful discrimination in violation of Title IX or the Constitution when it prohibits a transgender male [i.e., a biological female] student from using restrooms and locker rooms designated for men on campus.

The court concluded: “The simple answer is no.”

If adult coaches are required to be in the presence of partially or fully undressed students of the opposite sex who “identify” as “trans,” there remains no rational reason to prohibit adult coaches from being in the presence of partially dressed or fully nude students of the opposite sex who accept their sex.

In short, the “trans” ideology has invalidated objective, immutable [inborn] biological sex and its anatomical manifestation as having any relevance in separating humans in spaces where bodies are exposed.

I’ve tried to warn that the ultimate goal and logical outworking of the “trans” ideology is to eradicate all public recognition and valuation of sex differences.

According to the “trans” ideology, all it takes to “identify” as the opposite sex is a declaration. No gender dysphoria diagnosis or experience of gender dysphoria, no surgery, no cross-sex hormone-doping, not even cross-dressing is necessary to identify as the opposite sex.

Further, society is obligated to treat “trans”-identifying persons in all ways and in all contexts as the sex they declare they are. Therefore, a girl with intact breasts who identifies as a boy should be free to undress and shower naked with the boys, and a boy with an intact penis and testicles who identifies as a girl should be free to undress and shower with girls.

A girl with intact breasts who identifies as a boy should be allowed to swim on the boys’ swim team wearing a boys’ Speedo. Male coaches who enter boys’ locker rooms should treat girls who pretend they’re boys and are changing no differently than boys who are changing.

So, now what would have once been too scandalous to even imagine is being or going to be required.

Donna Garner

Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

UA-24036587-1