Google Find us on Google+

TEXANS SHOULD NOT TURN TO MARC TUCKER

May 11, 2013 by

Marc Tucker

by Donna Garner

5.10.13

 

Texas Sen. Dan Patrick is evidently using Marc Tucker’s NCEE  (National Center on Education and the Economy) May 7, 2013 report (http://www.ncee.org/college-and-work-ready/ ) as the basis for justifying the toxic education bills that the Senate and House are trying to push through the Legislature.

 

Texas certainly does not need to turn to Marc Tucker and the NCEE for anything.

Marc Tucker is wrong and has been wrong for many years.  It is Marc Tucker and his minions (the “red” people) who have helped to dumb down our Texas public schools starting in July 1997 when the Type #2 curriculum standards (TEKS) were adopted and implemented in Texas.

 

Please read the article posted below entitled “Marc Tucker’s Bologna” (published on 4.19.10) in which I describe who and what Marc Tucker is. (Unfortunately, some of the links are no longer active; but the basic message is still accurate.)

 

It is because 75% of our Texas high-school graduates have not been college-career ready that our elected Texas State Board of Education members (beginning in May 2008) completely shifted the direction of our Texas public schools.

 

The SBOE, working with the Texas Education Agency under the direction of Former-Commissioner of Education Robert Scott and the Present Commissioner of Education Michael Williams, has put a New Plan into place. (If Type #2 CSCOPE had not come slithering into our state, the New Plan would be implemented with fidelity in K – 10 right now.)

 

The New Plan (10th graders on down) includes Type #1 curriculum standards (TEKS), Type #1 STAAR/End-of-Course tests, and the high-information 4 x 4 graduation requirements.

 

If the New Plan is allowed to continue forward by the Texas Legislature, Texas could become the bellwether state to help lead the other states back into Type #1.  If the House and Senate toxic education bills are passed, our Texas schools will fall back into the same, dumbed-down Type #2 plan that Marc Tucker and his minions were able to put into place in Texas in July 1997.

 

Below are a number of current articles that explain what is happening in the Texas Legislature right now.  Below these links is the article that addresses Marc Tucker.

 

 

5.8.13 — “Duped Through Ignorance or Intent: Texas Legislators” —

http://educationviews.org/duped-through-ignorance-or-intent-texas-legislators/

 

============

 

5.7.13 – “The Worst Legislative Session Ever on Education” –http://nocompromisepac.ning.com/profiles/blogs/worst-legislative-session-ever-on-education-by-donna-garner-5-7?xg_source=activity

 

 

===============

 

5.2.13 – “Dumbing Down Communication Costs Lives” –http://educationviews.org/dumbing-down-communication-costs-lives/

 

===========

 

4.30.13 – “Texas Legislature Mucking Up Education” –http://nocompromisepac.ning.com/profiles/blogs/texas-legislature-mucking-up-education-by-donna-garner-4-30-13?xg_source=activity

 

=========

 

 

4.11.13 – “Education Is Serious Business: Green, Yellow, and Red People” — http://educationviews.org/education-is-serious-business-green-yellow-and-red-people/

 

 

===========

 

4.11.13 – “Open Letter to Texas Legislators: BAD BILLS — SB 1724 (Sen. Dan Patrick),  SB 3 (Sen. Dan Patrick), and HB 5 (Rep. Aycock) — http://nocompromisepac.ning.com/profiles/blogs/open-letter-to-tex-legislators-do-not-pass-these-bills-by-donna?xg_source=activity

 

========

 

4.3.13 – “Texans Must Be Patient: Help Is on the Way” —

http://educationviews.org/texans-must-be-patient-help-is-on-the-way/

 

=========

4.1.13 – “The Toxic Trio of Bad Bills: HB 5, SB 3, SB 1724” — http://educationviews.org/the-toxic-trio-of-bad-bills/

 

 

==========

 

3.20.13 – “What Gets Measured Gets Treasured: SB 1724 Would Harm Our Students”  —

http://educationviews.org/what-gets-measured-gets-treasured-sb-1724-would-harm-our-students/

 

*****************************

 

 

Published on 4.19.10

 

http://www.educationnews.org/commentaries/89899.html

 

Marc Tucker’s Bologna

by Donna Garner

4.19.10

 

I cannot sit back and be quiet when charlatans such as Marc Tucker are spreading their “bologna” around this nation.  Here is a man who has never taught a day in his life in K-12.  He has no education degree, does not know how students learn nor the curriculum they should be taught, and certainly should not be given the authority to reform the entire American school system…

 

According to various sources (e.g., Lynn M. Stuter in 1999 — http://www.learn-usa.com/relevant_to_et/ctd01.htm), Marc Tucker had an unhappy childhood in an unstable family.  He was in and out of foster homes, and his mother had several stays in mental hospitals.

 

Marc went to both Brown and Yale on academic scholarships.  His bachelor’s degree was in philosophy and American literature.  He was involved with the drama department at Yale until he dropped out of his graduate program there.  His masters at George Washington University was in telecommunications policy.

 

Tucker worked as a lighting technician at a PBS TV station in Boston and then began to work at the Northwest Regional Educational Laboratory (NWREL) in Portland, Oregon.

 

It is from NWREL that some of the worst education fads have either been launched or pushed onto the public schools: outcomes based education, Certificate of Mastery, death education curriculum (may have led to the shootings at Columbine High School in Littleton, Colorado), culturally based education, the New Jersey Writing Project/whole language instruction (e.g., scoring of student essays without grading for grammar/usage mistakes, invented spelling, chunking, metacognition, the balanced approach).

 

From NWREL, Tucker went to the U. S. Department of Education in Washington, D. C. Even though he has no degree in education, he later became a “professor of education” at the University of Rochester (1988-90) where he taught college students for two years.  So far as I can determine, that is Tucker’s only real teaching experience.

 

In 1988, Tucker became the president of the National Center for Education and the Economy (NCEE) where he joined up with Hillary Clinton, Mario Cuomo, and Ira Magaziner to get states to move away from local control of their schools and migrate to national standards.

 

In 1991, Marc Tucker and Lauren Resnick created New Standards that pushed standards-based reform.  In 1998, he and Judy Codding created America’s Choice that made sure the  national standards were further implemented into the schools; and in 2005, Tucker created the New Commission on the Skills of the American Workforce.

 

Tucker’s whole plan has been to require public school teachers to quit focusing on knowledge-based, academic content that emphasizes mostly objective testing with right-or-wrong answers.  Instead Tucker and his cohorts have managed to restructure completely the public schools, leading to the dumbing down of America’s school students.

 

This effort has been given a new level of control under Obama and Arne Duncan who have added federal “teeth” by creating Common Core Standards and the millions of federal dollars available through Race to the Top funding.

 

Now 48 states (except for Alaska and Texas) have committed to Tucker’s school “reform” model whereby the federal takeover of the public schools will be completed with national standards, national curriculum, national assessments, and a national database that ties students’ scores back to individual teachers to determine their salaries/tenure/evaluations. Teachers will be forced to teach daily whatever is on the national assessments in order to keep their jobs.

 

Tucker has teamed up with Obama, Arne Duncan, Hillary Clinton, Bill Gates, Warren Buffett, Linda Darling-Hammond, David Driscoll, Gene Wilhoit, Phil Daro, and others to move public school classrooms in 48 states into social engineering through subjective assessments that emphasize feelings, opinions, beliefs, multiculturalism, political correctness, diversity, global warming, homosexuality, and “social justice.”

 

…Tucker’s plan is nothing new; he called it “School to Work” in the 1980’s.  The idea is to educate a small percentage of the population and then make “worker bees” out of the rest of the masses, making sure that they are not able to read, write, or speak English well so that they cannot logically analyze and evaluate issues.  If the masses are kept ignorant, they can be easily controlled politically and socially by the few people at the top.

 

Tucker’s School-to-Work plan has simply morphed into what he is now calling “early college entrance.”  He is luring parents to buy into this idea by dressing it up in sweet-sounding words such as “college-level work,” “admission to selective colleges,” and “instructional programs that are among the best in the world.”

 

Tucker is giving both students and their parents false expectations.  College sounds very glamorous, and the idea of parents sending their 16-year olds to college appears to be quite sophisticated and intellectual, particularly to parents who have never experienced college for themselves.

 

Tucker is deliberately trying to deceive. The reality is that if the standards are measurable, knowledge-based, academic, rigorous and doable, almost all students need to take four years of high school to master them.  It is completely nonsensical to think that there would be many high-school students who could complete four years in two.  This would not happen if the high-school courses are content-rich and rigorous.

 

For instance, look over these Texas standards in the four core subjects. You will see that only an absolute genius could possibly master all of these elements in two years instead of four:

 

English / Language Arts / Reading — adopted in May 2008 — http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter110/index.html

 

Science — adopted in April 2009 — http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter112/index.html

 

Social Studies – adopted in May 2010

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter113/index.html

 

Math –adopted in May 2012

http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/rules/tac/chapter111/index.html

 

 

By compressing four years into two (freshman and sophomore years), Tucker’s idea is to fast-track and minimize the high-school curriculum so that students do not receive in-depth instruction in World History, U. S. History, economics, government, higher math, the great classics of the world, and advanced science.  Such two-year high school students would be bereft of the knowledge-base needed to cope with the adult problems of the world and certainly would not make well-informed voters nor citizens.

 

These students also would not have the flexibility and the knowledge-base to change vocations readily nor to get into college and be successful students.  Students (encouraged by their naïve parents) who unknowingly succumb to Tucker’s devious plan would end up having a very shallow educational background and would be doomed to the career pathway they chose when young and immature.

 

For all 33 years of my teaching career and until the present moment, I have fought for rigorous, explicit, doable goals for students to reach at each grade level.  I believe in the maxim that says, “How do you eat a huge pizza?  — one piece at a time.”  If a teacher has clear-cut goals that are reasonable and can bring his students along steadily and consistently from Day One of the school year, I believe most students can reach those goals through hard work and personal responsibility.   If students reach their goals at each grade level, they will be equipped to pursue college at the end of their four years in high school.

 

Then if they want to go directly into the workforce, that is fine.  However, if they want to choose college, they will also be equipped to become successful college students and to graduate, thus opening many doors of opportunity for them in life.  They will also have the equipping skills to be good citizens who can make wise choices over social, economic, and political issues.

 

 

Donna Garner
Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Google+Share on FacebookPin on PinterestShare on LinkedInShare on TumblrShare on StumbleUponPrint this pageEmail this to someone

Related Posts

Tags

Share This

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>