Gillard’s national civics curriculum flawed

Jun 19, 2013 by

kevin-donnelly

JULIA Gillard’s compulsory national curriculum, especially civics and citizenship, provides additional evidence why her Gonski-inspired school funding model must be opposed.

In a recent Swiss poll, such are the concerns about social fragmentation, economic slowdown and loss of cultural identity that 79 per cent of voters agreed that asylum laws should be tightened.

In 2011, British Prime Minister David Cameron declared that state-sponsored multiculturalism was breeding generations of young people hostile to the British way of life. The German Chancellor, Angela Merkel, in 2010 described multiculturalism as a failed policy and argued those wanting to live in Germany should integrate.

Central to overseas developments is the realisation that if societies are to survive and prosper there must be a commitment to citizenship and a willingness to support the institutions, values and way of life on which tolerance and respect for others are based.

Not so, according to those responsible for the Gillard government’s national curriculum that is being forced on all Australian schools as a condition of funding.

The history curriculum adopts a relativistic stance, stating Australia is made up of myriad cultures all deserving acceptance and respect. Children are made to focus on indigenous and Asian perspectives, and the debt owed to Western civilisation and our Judeo-Christian heritage is ignored.

The civics curriculum argues in favour of a postmodern, deconstructed definition of citizenship.

“Individuals may identify with multiple citizenships at any one point in time and over a period of time. Citizenship means different things to different people at different times and depending on personal perspectives, their social situation and where they live. This is reflected in multiple perspectives of citizenship that reflect personal, social, spatial and temporal dimensions of citizenship.”

The flaws are manifest. What right do Australians have to expect migrants to accept our laws, institutions and way of life? Such a subjective view of citizenship allows Islamic fundamentalists to justify mistreating women and carrying out jihad against non-believers.

As we saw in the race riots in Sweden this year, if there are no common values and beliefs that bind a community, society soon fragments into what Geoffrey Blainey once termed “a nation of tribes”.

One of the growing terrorist threats are home-grown extremists who feel no loyalty to the society in which they were born and raised. While nodding in the direction of the liberal, democratic values, there is no recognition of the values and beliefs that make Australia stable, peaceful and tolerant.

The curriculum states that Australia is “a secular nation with a multicultural and multi-faith society”; one where students are told they should “learn to value their own cultures, languages and beliefs, and those of others”.

Yet, while it is true that Australia is a secular society, ours is predominantly a Christian country and Judeo-Christian values are the bedrock of our institutions and way of life.

Tolerance, respect for others, equality before the law, individual liberty, honesty and truth telling are values that define us as a nation and they can only be fully understood in the context of the Christian religion.

In the curriculum, Christianity is airbrushed from the nation’s civic life although there is a reference to “religious groups to which Australians of Asian heritage belong”. The consultation report says: “The treatment of religion within the paper needs to be reviewed to include more reference to non-religious views.”.

Mandating a cultural Left national curriculum on schools will leave students with a biased understanding of their responsibilities as citizens.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Related Posts

Tags

Share This

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.