Nov 15, 2018 by

Open Letter to Texas State Board of Education Members

“Hillary Clinton Not Fit To Be Placed in Texas Students’ Social Studies Textbooks”

By Donna Garner


Should Hillary Clinton be included as an important historical figure in Texas students’ social studies textbooks?

This issue will be decided tomorrow, Nov. 16, 2018, by the Texas State Board of Education.  The historical figures studied by Texas students should be those who have made contributions to America’s greatness and to whom children can look as good role models.

*Please contact Texas State Board of Education members before Friday’s final vote.

Contact info. for SBOE:


The two negatives against Hillary Clinton have nothing to do with one’s politics nor with President Donald Trump. These two negatives were decisions made by Hillary herself and offer sufficient grounds for the SBOE to decide NOT to include her in Texas’ social studies textbooks:  (1) Hillary’s unsecured server and (2) Hillary’s Benghazi lies.  

Hillary Clinton committed criminal acts for which she may still be prosecuted. The U. S. Senate is considering doing a complete investigation of Hillary Clinton (e.g., unsecured server, Benghazi, Russian dossier, FISA warrants, Clinton Foundation, Fusion/GPS, etc.).  Texas parents do not want their children reading textbooks about Hillary in the future that glorify her rather than presenting the facts about her.


7.5.16 – The FBI could not resurrect a number of e-mails purged by Hillary Clinton’s lawyers but did find the following:   

110 e-mails in 52 chains – Classified at the time

8 e-mails – Top Secret at the time

36 e-mails — Secret at the time

8 e-mails — Confidential at the time

7.5.16 — “Statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System” – FBI Press Office —


Here are the laws that Hillary Clinton clearly broke. Please be sure to click on the embedded links to view the specific laws: 

Clinton intentionally divulged classified information (…18 U.S.C. § 798), that she intentionally removed and retained classified information without authorization (…18 U.S.C. § 1924), or that she lied about it to federal investigators (…18 U.S.C. § 1001). 

…the facts, as outlined by Comey, … under 18 U.S.C. § 793, which, among other things, makes it a federal crime, punishable by up to 10 years’ imprisonment, for an official who has been entrusted with classified information relating to the national defense to “permit … the same to be removed from its proper place of custody or delivered to anyone in violation of his trust, or to be lost, stolen, abstracted, or destroyed” through the exercise of gross negligence. (7.5.16 – “The Explanation Americans Deserve From FBI on Clinton’s Server Use” — By John G. Malcolm – The Daily Signal )


10.31.16 — “Hillary Clinton Email Scandal Explained” — By Patrick Howley – Breitbart


Associated Press lists Hillary’s lies:   

7.5.16 – “AP: Clinton Email Claims Collapse Under FBI Probe” — Newsmax.comAssociated Press


10.25.17 – “Hillary’s 33,000 e-mails might not be missing after all” — By Paul Sperry – New York Post


8.5.18 — “5 More Classified Hillary E-Mails Uncovered” — by World Net Daily —




During the entire time that Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State under the Obama administration, she put all Americans’ lives at risk by having an unsecured server in her home in upstate New York.  Every e-mail communication sent and received on that unsecured server went directly to a Chinese company that had embedded a Chinese code. The FBI under Obama was warned about the problem but refused to act. Anyone else who blatantly ignored security protocol would have been sent to jail immediately.  

8.27.18 — “China Hacked Clinton’s Private Email Server” — by Richard Pollock — The Daily Caller


2.7.18 – “FBI Missed Clinton Emails Openly MARKED Classified, Wanted To Conclude Probe Before IG Caught Mistake” — By Luke Rosiak – The Daily Caller


6.28.16 – Chicago Tribune

[FROM DONNA GARNER:  The House Committee Report clearly showed that Hillary Clinton lied by making the public think that the Benghazi attacks were the result of an anti-Islam video instead of an al-Qaida faction. In fact, on the night of the attack, Hillary e-mailed Chelsea and told her the truth but kept the lie to the public going for weeks. Evidently Hillary did this for political reasons because she was getting ready to run for President and did not want the public to know that she had ignored Ambassador Chris Stevens repeated requests for more security. The Texas State Board of Education has definite grounds NOT to include Hillary Clinton in its Social Studies curriculum standards because Hillary put politics above people’s lives.]

“Benghazi: What the report reveals about Hillary Clinton”

Editorial Board

Excerpts from this article:

The House committee report makes clear that then-Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knew almost immediately that the Benghazi attack was the planned work of terrorists, not a spontaneous mob action.

Two years in the making, 800 pages long, gripping in tone, the report of the U.S. House Select Committee on Benghazi — released Tuesday — is the definitive account of the Sept. 11, 2012, Libya attacks that killed four Americans: Ambassador Chris Stevens, foreign service officer Sean Smith and CIA contractors Glen Doherty and Tyrone Woods.

… A preliminary Select Committee report was published a year ago. Last October Clinton testified in public for 11 hours…

But when packaged as a complete volume, the report delivers on its promise to analyze the entire debacle so the risk of a future disaster is reduced. On the question of how Clinton and the Obama administration reacted, we see more than enough evidence to reaffirm our opinion that the secretary of state failed a crucial chance to show decisive, principled leadership.

The crux of it is that during and well after the chaos of the attacks on the State Department’s outpost and nearby CIA annex in Benghazi, Clinton and the Obama administration promoted a false narrative for public consumption: that the violence came from a spontaneous outburst of mob anger. Although Clinton confided to her daughter, Chelsea, in an email that night that an al-Qaida faction was responsible, for two weeks she let fester the story that mob action, not a planned assault her department might have anticipated, killed her employees.

The supposition Clinton and others held to was that the attacks were related in nature to political protests the same day outside the U.S. Embassy in Cairo. Those demonstrators were angry about an anti-Islam video. With the Benghazi attacks still unfolding, Clinton released the administration’s only statement on the evening of Sept. 11, and she focused on the video. But the next day, Clinton told Egyptian Prime Minister Hesham Kandil, “We know that the attack in Libya had nothing to do with the film. It was a planned attack — not a protest.”

What she told Kandil was true, the report confirms: The Americans came under sudden attack at their compound by a force of about 70 heavily armed men. The only warning: the sudden disappearance of a Libyan police vehicle. Attackers approached the building, invaded and set fire to it. Stevens and Smith died in the fire. Doherty and Woods were killed in a subsequent attack on the CIA annex.

As hours and days passed, the report shows, inaccurate accounts of the Benghazi timeline inexplicably endured. On Sept. 14, White House spokesman Jay Carney said: “We have no information to suggest that it was a preplanned attack. The unrest we’ve seen around the region has been in reaction to a video that Muslims, many Muslims find offensive.”

The administration looked for an official to go on the Sunday morning talk shows Sept. 16. Ben Rhodes, President Barack Obama’s deputy national security adviser, sent a request to Clinton but never heard back. The thankless job fell to Susan Rice, the U.S. ambassador to the U.N. Rice had little knowledge of the events. She relied in part on background information from Rhodes.

Here the report gets at the politics of Benghazi, because it shows that among Rhodes’ talking points to Rice was this specific goal to communicate to the viewing public: “To underscore that these protests are rooted in an Internet video, and not a broader failure of policy.”

In other words: In mid-September 2012, in the wake of a terrorist attack in Libya, with Obama up for re-election in two months and Clinton’s own presidential aspirations at risk, the White House sent a lesser representative in front of the cameras. Armed with bad information, she insisted that four Americans died as the result of a spontaneous protest — not because of Washington’s failure to anticipate a terrorist attack on an isolated U.S. compound in unstable Libya on the anniversary of 9/11.

…Obama, too, went uncorrected publicly by Clinton when, in several public appearances, he conflated Arab world protests about the video with the terrorist attack in Benghazi. In a Sept. 25 speech at the U.N., Obama cited the video six times.

…we looked for evidence that Clinton managed a terrible ordeal and its fallout with exemplary skill and integrity. Unfortunately, we didn’t find that either…

Donna Garner

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.