Perverted Ruling by Obama’s USDOE

Nov 5, 2015 by

rape cartoon

“Perverted Ruling by Obama’s USDOE”

By Donna Garner

11.4.15

 

[COMMENTS FROM DONNA GARNER — The Obama USDOE’s ruling yesterday to force an Illinois public school to allow males to shower with females is despicable; but I tried to warn the public back on 11.7.10.  Please go to the following link and read my article entitled “Open Letter to Parents, Legislators, School Personnel: Which Policy Are You Going To Promote?” —  http://kgab.com/students-losing-their-right-to-express-their-opinions-by-donna-garner/.

 

Unfortunately, at that time our country was still basking in Obama’s election to the Presidency; and many chose to label me as a “right-wing homophobe.”

 

Now our country is beginning to see the reality of Obama’s perverted ideology which seems to have no limits. He has surrounded himself with government agency personnel who hold the same perverted ideology, and now they are using their “bullying” tactics to force school districts into compliance or else have their federal funds taken away from them.  

 

The following article is blunt but should force our nation to face the reality of the damage Obama is doing to our nation.  

 

My hope and prayer is that school districts all over America will practice civil disobedience, knowing that Obama and his ilk will be dumped in a little over a year. School districts should hold fast and use delaying tactics that will serve to protect the public school children in their charge.

 

Thankfully the voters in Houston, Texas, have led the way by rejecting the “boys in girls’ bathrooms” ballot proposition yesterday by a vote of 62% against.  “Great work, Houston.”  – Donna Garner]

 

=========

 

11.3.15 – Godfather Politics


“Boy Has Civil Right To Get Naked in Front of Girls, Feds Rule”

 

 

http://godfatherpolitics.com/26164/boy-has-civil-right-to-get-naked-in-front-of-girls-feds-rule/

 

The people who work at the U.S. Department of Education’s Office for Civil Rights must be insane, on drugs or both.

 

How else to explain their ruling that a teenage boy in the Township High School District 211 in Palatine, Illinois, has a right to undress in front of teenage girls in the girls’ locker room?

 

The boy in question “identifies” as a girl and first contacted the Civil Rights Office in 2013 after “she” was denied use of the girls’ locker room. Two years’ investigation and lengthy negotiations later, the district thought an agreement was near when it said it would put up a privacy curtain and the boy would have to get dressed and undressed behind it so as to protect the privacy of the real girls.

 

But that wasn’t good enough for the ACLU or the feds. After all, how dare the school district require a boy to get naked behind a curtain?

 

John Knight, director of the LGBT and AIDS Project at ACLU, which is representing the boy, said, “It’s one thing to say to all the girls, ‘You can choose if you want some extra privacy,’ but it’s another thing to say, ‘You, and you alone, must use them.’ That sends a pretty strong signal to her that she’s not accepted and the district does not see her as girl.”

 

That’s unequal!

 

You know what’s unequal? A Y chromosome and a pair of testicles in a girls’ locker room.

 

That might also have something to do with why the school district doesn’t see “her” as a girl … because he’s a boy.

 

Just a hunch.

 

So now this mentally ill boy will legally have the right to get naked and shower with naked girls. And if he gets a few jollies out of it, who’s gonna care? The important thing is that our federal government has established the important civil right of American males to invade private space meant for young underage women.

 

So for those keeping track, that means if a male touches a girl under 18 sexually, he’ll be arrested; if he shows a picture of his junk to a girl, he can be arrested; if he looks at a naked girl through her window, he’ll be arrested.

 

BUT, if he walks into a girls’ locker room, takes off all his clothes in front of the girls inside and then watches them as he lathers himself in the same area as them, it’s a civil right so long as he claims to be a girl.

 

And you’ll notice that it’s the girls who have to bear the brunt of this liberal madness.

This is another front in the real war on women being waged by liberals.

 

 

 

Donna Garner

Wgarner1@hot.rr.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 Comment

  1. Avatar
    Karen Bracken

    The outcome is up to parents. This would never be allowed in front of my children boys or girls. This is an out right attempt to destroy gender and morals. And there is a reason behind it and it has nothing to do with civil rights.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.