PHYSICIST  PROVES  PRE-SET ALGORITHMS STOLE THE 2020 ELECTIONS

Apr 2, 2021 by

Lindell TV

PHYSICIST  PROVES  PRE-SET ALGORITHMS STOLE THE 2020 ELECTIONS — LINDELL TV — 4.2.21

Mike Lindell has just released his new documentary interview with Dr. Douglas G. Frank. 

Dr. Douglas Frank holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Frank is an internationally recognized scientist with over fifty scientific publications. In 1990 Dr. Frank discovered and invented a technique for creating three dimensional images of molecules resting on surfaces. This led to a cover article in Science Magazine, which is the most read science magazine in the world by scientists.

WHAT DR. FRANK DISCOVERED ABOUT NOV. 2020 ELECTIONS

Dr. Frank has spent countless hours since the 2020 elections following the data of the election returns county by county across such states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado to name a few.

Dr. Frank’s scientific and mathematical investigation has revealed that there was absolutely massive cyber fraud in the 2020 elections.

Dr. Frank’s investigation reveals that the 2010 national census data was used to pre-set the algorithms in the voting machines.  This in turn manipulated the 2020 election rolls by injecting phantom votes into the election totals.

His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.

By using the 2010 census, the cheaters [China, Iran, the Biden campaign, the Democrats?] who pre-set the algorithm “keys” produced votes for voters who had passed away or who no longer lived in the county or state.

In numerous documented cases, voters showed up to vote at their precinct only to be told they had already voted, when in fact, they had not voted.

What is now being revealed by the scientific investigation of Dr. Frank is that these Americans had their votes cast for them through a highly sophisticated computer program.

This fraud did not occur in just a few precincts, counties, or swing states but occurred on a national basis as shown by Dr. Frank’s statistics and charts.  

Dr. Frank also reveals that even in the states President Trump won, the President won those states by larger numbers than was reported.

PLEASE WATCH THIS LINK TO MIKE LINDELL’S INTERVIEW WITH DR. FRANK: https://lindelltv.com/

STATE LEGISLATORS MUST ACT NOW

This must not be allowed to continue, and state legislators can and should pass election integrity laws to prohibit these pre-set algorithms from disenfranchising our votes.  

The elections of 2022 will soon be here, and the time is short to fix these election problems. State legislators must act NOW so that voters will go to the polls to vote, knowing that their votes will be protected!

Please share with everyone you know to help save our country! 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

5 Comments

  1. Avatar
    Bryan

    Dr Frank uses a lot of sophisticated language to dazzle the viewer, but he never actually draws a connection between his “finding” and his “conclusion”. The basic argument comes down to:

    (a) I’ve found this relationship in the data
    (b) The relationship couldn’t have happened naturally
    (c) Therefore it was Chinese interference

    Each step of the way has problems. In step (a), all he shows is that he’s able to model ballots (output) based on number of voters (input). He says he can “predict” how many ballots were submitted, but he’s actually “describing” how many ballots were submitted. (You know it’s not a prediction, because he started with the answer and then used it to create his formula; a prediction would start with the formula and produce the answer).

    Step (b) is only ever asserted. There’s no discussion of what a “natural” election would look like, nor any real discussion of “how” unnatural this one was. If you flip a coin and it comes up heads that appears “unnatural”, but there’s a probability associated with it (0.1%). Dr Frank never mentions the probability for the election. He references R number, but this is only describing how well his model correlates, not how well it *should be able to* correlate. (The correlation itself is another discussion — high correlation doesn’t mean you’re right; “correlation doesn’t equal causation”)

    Step (c) is supposed to be deduced from (a) and (b) but there are no lines of logic applied to get us from (b) to (c). Not only does Dr Frank not rule out other explanations for how (b) could have happened (from the probable to the unbelievable), he doesn’t *support* his given explanation either. Of all the possible explanations we could have to see the results he’s seeing, he just picked the one that fit his preconceived narrative.

    The trick is, he spends so much time explaining the math to us, that the first thing we do is try to recreate the math to see if it works. Lo and behold, the math works! But it’s all just a distraction, to keep you from seeing that it’s not the math, but the rest of the argument that breaks down.

    I don’t know if this site censors their comments or not — Dr Frank loves to rail against censorship while very carefully pruning his own comment feeds — but I have an even more in-depth analysis including some of my own impressive graphs and charts if people are interested. They also include a stream-of-consciousness replay of the video, if you’d rather save yourself the hour of watching it yourself.

    • Avatar
      John

      Dr. Frank developed his “key” by averaging 8 counties. He then applied the key to the remaining counties, and it fit almost perfectly. How is that simply “description” rather than “prediction”?

  2. Avatar
    Charles

    The 2020 election MUST BE OVERTURNED and the RIGHTFUL winner President Donald J. Trump placed back in the Oval Office whether it be now or a year from now !

  3. Avatar
    David Gaertner

    Dr. Frank, I independently validated your curves for Hamilton County, Ohio by downloading Census and Ohio voter files and composing and analyzing the data. I also produced a second set of curves that will reveal new insights by shaping your 2019 Census Hamilton County curve which has a single data point for each 5 year age group using the Ohio state Census curve which has a data point for each individual age. The population totals for the 5 year age groups are still honored. It provides a different perspective to visualize the data. You will see all 3 curves have the same shape now. It show’s the indisputable relationship of registration and voter curves to the Census data. Unfortunately, I can’t attach the screen prints or Excel file I made and I’m not a social media participant. Would be happy to send them by email. I am a conservative Christian and a Chemical Engineer with 40 years experience where I’ve analyzed a lot of data over the year. Thank you so much for your courage and curiosity which I also share. We have to wake people up to the truth. Have a Happy Easter! David

    • Avatar
      Frank Slade

      David – would you mind pointing me to the sites so I can verify this myself? I’m also an engineering and have looked into the data myself, but I can’t find any free registration data. I think the more people see this with their own eyes the better.

      Many thanks

      Frank

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.