PHYSICIST  PROVES  PRE-SET ALGORITHMS STOLE THE 2020 ELECTIONS

Apr 2, 2021 by

Lindell TV

PHYSICIST  PROVES  PRE-SET ALGORITHMS STOLE THE 2020 ELECTIONS — LINDELL TV — 4.2.21

Mike Lindell has just released his new documentary interview with Dr. Douglas G. Frank. 

Dr. Douglas Frank holds a Ph.D in Surface Analytical Chemistry from the University of Cincinnati. Dr. Frank is an internationally recognized scientist with over fifty scientific publications. In 1990 Dr. Frank discovered and invented a technique for creating three dimensional images of molecules resting on surfaces. This led to a cover article in Science Magazine, which is the most read science magazine in the world by scientists.

WHAT DR. FRANK DISCOVERED ABOUT NOV. 2020 ELECTIONS

Dr. Frank has spent countless hours since the 2020 elections following the data of the election returns county by county across such states as Ohio, Pennsylvania, and Colorado to name a few.

Dr. Frank’s scientific and mathematical investigation has revealed that there was absolutely massive cyber fraud in the 2020 elections.

Dr. Frank’s investigation reveals that the 2010 national census data was used to pre-set the algorithms in the voting machines.  This in turn manipulated the 2020 election rolls by injecting phantom votes into the election totals.

His scientific investigation documented and proved that numerous states throughout America had more people voting than lived in many of the counties.

By using the 2010 census, the cheaters [China, Iran, the Biden campaign, the Democrats?] who pre-set the algorithm “keys” produced votes for voters who had passed away or who no longer lived in the county or state.

In numerous documented cases, voters showed up to vote at their precinct only to be told they had already voted, when in fact, they had not voted.

What is now being revealed by the scientific investigation of Dr. Frank is that these Americans had their votes cast for them through a highly sophisticated computer program.

This fraud did not occur in just a few precincts, counties, or swing states but occurred on a national basis as shown by Dr. Frank’s statistics and charts.  

Dr. Frank also reveals that even in the states President Trump won, the President won those states by larger numbers than was reported.

PLEASE WATCH THIS LINK TO MIKE LINDELL’S INTERVIEW WITH DR. FRANK: https://lindelltv.com/

STATE LEGISLATORS MUST ACT NOW

This must not be allowed to continue, and state legislators can and should pass election integrity laws to prohibit these pre-set algorithms from disenfranchising our votes.  

The elections of 2022 will soon be here, and the time is short to fix these election problems. State legislators must act NOW so that voters will go to the polls to vote, knowing that their votes will be protected!

Please share with everyone you know to help save our country! 

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

36 Comments

  1. Jack McGrath

    Loud enough to be heard, not subdued, muffled, hurried or laughingly.

  2. Jack McGrath

    Presenters need to speak directly to the mic, not sideways to an emcee. Their voice needs to be loud enough to hear.

  3. Jack McGrath

    We need a straightforward, well-organized presentation, uninterrupted by emcees.

    • B. T.

      There are straightforward presentations he does about counties in Michigan. He was directed by the attorney to address these 9 counties for the court. I found it on Frank speech.com. I believe there are other you tube videos. It walks through it slowly so even the unmathematical people like me get that “aha” moment.

  4. Jack McGrath

    Again, where are my comments?

  5. Jack McGrath

    Somebody needs to tell Lindell that Randall Hause is doing his message a disservice by interrupting Dr. Frank and Matt Deperno.

  6. Jack McGrath

    Wonder what happened to my comment.

  7. John McGrath

    I appreciate Dr. Frank’s exposing the truth. He is invaluable. It is a shame and very frustrating that he gets interrupted by the emcee on frankspeech.com. Hause needs to learn not to interrupt. In other words, TO KEEP HIS MOUTH SHUT.

    Jack McGrath

  8. JZ

    If you’re stupid enough to believe anything a crackhead like Mike Lindell has to say, you deserve whatever happens to you.

    • Trevor Lahey

      Are you out of your mind? You’re the one thats gotta be on crack for saying that lol

    • Trevor Lahey

      Mike Lindell is a good man, he overcame addiction and started the Lindell Recovery Network. You are a sad excuse telling people what deserves to happen to them because they listened and learned what happened to our country. You cannot make it up, especially now that it is verified 100% in Absolute Interference. I encourage everyone reading to go to mike Lindell’s new social media platform Frank Speech (you need to type it exactly in your browser b/c it is censored) -> Frank Speech dot com -> no spaces and don’t spell dot com obviously… it keeps deleting my comments because they don’t want you posting links.

    • Mike Lahey

      Mike Lindell is a good man, he overcame addiction and started the Lindell Recovery Network. You are a sad excuse telling people what deserves to happen to them because they listened and learned what happened to our country. You cannot make it up, especially now that it is verified 100% in Absolute Interference. I encourage everyone reading to go to Mike Lindell’s new social media platform Frank Speech.

    • A.I.

      where was JZ when God passed out the brains ?

    • You have injected your present algorithm for complete myopic SLANDER. When you become more ingenuous then speak with the tongue that has been blessed by God. Pray for your recovery. Mike has persons that have GOD, not the negative which dwells in the fire down below. Tree of Life…not the Tree of knowledge which shades the troll’s in a false light. It must be absolutely lonely in Bizarroworld Buddy.

    • Jack McGrath

      Who are you to judge?

  9. Rita Martin

    I’m no mathematician but trying to follow the logic. How is the ‘key’ for each state calculated? Thank you

    • Scott H

      The key used doesn’t tell who won. It tells you that one key for each state will tell you the percent of vote in every county of that state. Let’s say 88 % of 18 year olds voted in the county he is studying. 91% of 19 year olds, all the way up to 100 year old. Gives you a key for the county. He was able to inject the same key for EVERY county in that state. 88% of 18 year olds in every county of the state! Not possible!! And then he did same thing on like 5 other states! Taking a sample from one county of each state! Not possible outcome.

  10. Bryan

    Dr Frank uses a lot of sophisticated language to dazzle the viewer, but he never actually draws a connection between his “finding” and his “conclusion”. The basic argument comes down to:

    (a) I’ve found this relationship in the data
    (b) The relationship couldn’t have happened naturally
    (c) Therefore it was Chinese interference

    Each step of the way has problems. In step (a), all he shows is that he’s able to model ballots (output) based on number of voters (input). He says he can “predict” how many ballots were submitted, but he’s actually “describing” how many ballots were submitted. (You know it’s not a prediction, because he started with the answer and then used it to create his formula; a prediction would start with the formula and produce the answer).

    Step (b) is only ever asserted. There’s no discussion of what a “natural” election would look like, nor any real discussion of “how” unnatural this one was. If you flip a coin and it comes up heads that appears “unnatural”, but there’s a probability associated with it (0.1%). Dr Frank never mentions the probability for the election. He references R number, but this is only describing how well his model correlates, not how well it *should be able to* correlate. (The correlation itself is another discussion — high correlation doesn’t mean you’re right; “correlation doesn’t equal causation”)

    Step (c) is supposed to be deduced from (a) and (b) but there are no lines of logic applied to get us from (b) to (c). Not only does Dr Frank not rule out other explanations for how (b) could have happened (from the probable to the unbelievable), he doesn’t *support* his given explanation either. Of all the possible explanations we could have to see the results he’s seeing, he just picked the one that fit his preconceived narrative.

    The trick is, he spends so much time explaining the math to us, that the first thing we do is try to recreate the math to see if it works. Lo and behold, the math works! But it’s all just a distraction, to keep you from seeing that it’s not the math, but the rest of the argument that breaks down.

    I don’t know if this site censors their comments or not — Dr Frank loves to rail against censorship while very carefully pruning his own comment feeds — but I have an even more in-depth analysis including some of my own impressive graphs and charts if people are interested. They also include a stream-of-consciousness replay of the video, if you’d rather save yourself the hour of watching it yourself.

    • John

      Dr. Frank developed his “key” by averaging 8 counties. He then applied the key to the remaining counties, and it fit almost perfectly. How is that simply “description” rather than “prediction”?

      • Trevor Lahey

        This site removes my comments when I try to post… I have verified myself and have come to the conclusion that, not only is Dr. Frank correct (right on the money actually) and therefore incredibly intelligent, but he was given a godly stroke of luck when he discovered the key and thought to expand on its initial meaning. Unbeleivable work and impressive dedication!

      • Bryan

        It’s not a prediction because he did it after the fact. I can predict how old you are if you tell me when you were born.

      • Mark

        Hmmm, Trevor Lahey and Mike Lahey. I think both these people are bots (at least one is.) One is plagiarizing the other.

    • Ron Chura

      You proved only 2 things. You’re a democrat and you hate Trump

      • Bryan

        Why, because I can speak intelligently about a subject? Caught me. (Except I’m not a Dem…)

    • QuashiSev

      Looks like we got another ALAN DUKE everybody! Not only are YOU writing a big long explanation to dazzle readers, but you don’t even make sense while you do it lol – I encourage anyone reading to go to FrankSpeech.com and watch Absolute Proof, and Absolute Interference (Just released April 20th, 2021).

      • Bryan

        What part confused you, specifically? I’d be happy to explain it further.

    • Barry Lee Martin

      I am interested in the more in-depth analysis that you have created. How can I retrieve that from you? I have been following this closely and extremely interested.

      • Bryn

        Take a look here: https://1drv.ms/w/s!Aq3QV2ZWr_Edm-9uk1LJ8AtJqO9d7A?e=0b6dGm

        (Depending on when you see this comment, I’m in the process of adding new information. It’s a live link so you might see a little mess before it gets cleaner, however the broad strokes will still be there).

        • Q

          5 key states stopped counting at the same time.
          Dominion officials original alibi was voting machines not connected to internet.
          Hand count in Antrim County reversed the faked voting machine count.
          When counting “resumed” the leader of the race change dramatically in all 5 states.
          Atlanta Hawks video shows counting continued.

    • B.T.

      What you are forgetting or didn’t see was how he connected the dots. Even though he had the data side which showed the numbers which are humanly impossible he didn’t know how it happened until he viewed absolute proof where he viewed the data from Mary Manning and Maria Zack who can show the IP addresses from China, Italy, Leonardo, etc. There is a printout of every vote that was manipulated, what country grabbed it and sent it back to the machines. Maria Zach has all the information about our servers in Frankfurt, Germany and how when the algorithm was exceeded emergency agents were in the US embassy in Rome using the Leonardo satellite to finish the job. She has documented the transfer of Obama Iran money redirected back to pay for this. She has the confessions. It caused an upheaval in Italian politics by outing some guilty people that should have been major news. You can find articles on some European sites. The states Trump won, he actually won by a larger margin. The work of Colonel Philip Waldron is great. His data analysis the way votes are deleted, switched, devalued. Devalued means usually. 75 for Trump and 1.25 for Biden. He explains that you can never end with a vote total with a decimal. Mike Lindell allowed the experts to present. Yea, he interrupts but they presented the message

    • Susan

      Just curious…Bryan…what are your credentials? How long have you been studying Algorithms and graphs and China’s complete hate and the CCP’s obcession with owning America and every other Country for that matters? College educated…that doesn’t say much these days, capeesh? Liberalism is owned by China…Teachers Unions are owned by: China… Possibly “you” are owned by
      C H I N A… My GOD is a MIGHTY GOD, He REIGNS in Heaven Above and you will be prayed over and over again…whoever you are!

  11. Charles

    The 2020 election MUST BE OVERTURNED and the RIGHTFUL winner President Donald J. Trump placed back in the Oval Office whether it be now or a year from now !

  12. David Gaertner

    Dr. Frank, I independently validated your curves for Hamilton County, Ohio by downloading Census and Ohio voter files and composing and analyzing the data. I also produced a second set of curves that will reveal new insights by shaping your 2019 Census Hamilton County curve which has a single data point for each 5 year age group using the Ohio state Census curve which has a data point for each individual age. The population totals for the 5 year age groups are still honored. It provides a different perspective to visualize the data. You will see all 3 curves have the same shape now. It show’s the indisputable relationship of registration and voter curves to the Census data. Unfortunately, I can’t attach the screen prints or Excel file I made and I’m not a social media participant. Would be happy to send them by email. I am a conservative Christian and a Chemical Engineer with 40 years experience where I’ve analyzed a lot of data over the year. Thank you so much for your courage and curiosity which I also share. We have to wake people up to the truth. Have a Happy Easter! David

    • Frank Slade

      David – would you mind pointing me to the sites so I can verify this myself? I’m also an engineering and have looked into the data myself, but I can’t find any free registration data. I think the more people see this with their own eyes the better.

      Many thanks

      Frank

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.