How to Talk School Choice and Win

Sep 5, 2016 by

Beverly Hallberg –

“Choice” always seems to be a winning argument for the left, except when it comes to education. Liberals repeatedly cry foul as soon as someone champions school choice at (what they perceive to be) the expense of public education.

Conservatives claim the opposite is true—school choice empowers students by giving their families educational options.

So, it seems like we’re at an impasse with no middle ground in sight. Not true. As we’ve talked about these past several weeks, there are points of agreement to acknowledge, examples to use, and words to help frame your argument.

School choice is a nuanced and controversial topic, but not one that can’t be addressed.

1. Common Ground

Whether someone supports school choice or not, everyone wants quality education for kids.

This plot of common ground is also why the debate can get so heated—education is an important component of society and the key to opportunity.

As the discussion continues on how to achieve ideal educational reforms, remember that the person you’re debating most likely agrees that children should have access to quality education regardless of ZIP code or parental income. Start there.

2. Examples 

Once you express common ground, the best way to win the “school choice” argument is by illustrating its successes, so show examples of how and where it’s worked.

Tell the story of District of Columbia charter schools. Since school choice was established in 2004, more than 6,000 students have graduated at levels well above the public school average. Then transition to your community—how many kids in your neighborhood/city/state wait in line to walk through metal detectors because they’re placed in an unsafe public school? If a safer environment exists outside their ZIP code, give them the opportunity to attend. Only good comes when kids are allowed to learn in a safe environment.

Tell the story of exceptional kids who are disadvantaged if they’re made to fit into the one-size-fits-all public school down the block. Every student is different, so the educational experience should be best tailored to him/her. A violin prodigy will be better served by attending a fine arts high school; a child with health needs may be better served by learning online.

And here’s the kicker—if  you think America’s public schools need reform, then you should champion school choice. It’s been proven time and again that public schools improve when school choice is allowed in the community.

3. Words

This is an emotional topic, and liberals love to emphasize words like “choice” and “opportunity” and “fairness” in reference to education. But we say, STEAL THEIR WORDS.

School choice offers “choice” and “opportunity” to kids stuck in failing schools. What’s “fair” is to give all kids a chance regardless of their ZIP code. Be emotional, not economic; make your argument about the people involved rather than the cost to the taxpayer.

By stealing their words, you’ll also prove that school choice more effectively and efficiently achieves the goals liberals think failed big-government policies should.

Bottom line: find common ground, use examples, insert the right language, and you’ll be a champion in the fight to make sure every kid receives a quality education.

Source: How to Talk School Choice and Win

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

1 Comment

  1. Avatar
    Chris Doeller

    In today’s cry for school choice and the lambasting that some schools are no good, and parent need alternative options for their children, all seem to point out that Americans have become more separated from the idea of community and communal good. In the semi rural Maryland suburbs where I grew up, in the 60s, it was common, in many neighborhoods to look askance at any parent who did not sen the child to the neighborhood school. As a result there were only a few alternatives to the neighborhood school. When the community needed to assemble, it was always at these neighborhood schools and they became de facto town halls.
    In the 1980s this idea was eroded, along with the idea that both parents were now in the workplace. The idea that any local school was less than satisfactory also was eroded as the fact that both parents worked, there was no one to build bridges in the neighborhood with other families.
    Today the notion that one school is not good implies that schools are independent of the students and parents who are attached to these schools. The public believes that if one school is
    ranked” as being superior, it must be some secret ingredient that the school administration is using, Never is it acknowledged that schools are, in effect, three legged stools, made up of cooperative students, supportive parents, & competent staff. Any weakening part in this symbiotic relationship and the system fails. Parents are too self absorbed, these days and do not want to invest in their neighborhood schools for the long run, especially after their child has moved to the next level. A strong local school requires constant investment and support.
    Fooling yourself into the idea that the solution to a better education is to have school choice, is to rely on others to do the heavy lifting. Too many American parents want to simply buy into a good school just for the short term then move on. Its how our communities have been developing these past 30 years.
    Everyone is just there, like a bus stop, wanting what they want when they want it, then are gone when the ashtrays are full.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.